Yes, I know that several of those work fine, my issue here is with attitude. If the vendor didn't know about Daz Studio I would say noing about it. It is a bit clueless to not know about a major player in the industry but it would not be a big deal, I would work with the vendor to make him/her aware of the alternative product. It's when I see "not tested with Studio" message that I have a problem. That is simple laziness. If Studio was an expensive application I would understand. If it only ran on one OS, I would understand; but it's free and it runs both on Mac OS and Windows. I don't use Poser and still I test my products on it. I don't use Windows but I still test them on that platform. Because quality is very important to me and I don't release a product until it's tested to the best of my abilities. Developing software, and 3d products are software, is expensive and time consuming. Yes, that's the nature of the deal. It makes it harder to turn a profit when you spend that kind of time. That's ok, I'd rather sound a bit more and have a more complete product. Vendors like PropChick, who bundle the Studio shaders, together with the Poser ones, are the example to follow.

Paolo

https://www.preta3d.com
FB: https://www.facebook.com/RealityPlugIn
Tw: @preta3d
G+: https://plus.google.com/106625816153304163119
The Reality Gallery: https://reality-plug-in.deviantart.com