Quote - I've found Flash9d.ocx in C:WINDOWSsystem32MacromedFlash
and Flash10d.ocx in C:WINDOWSSysWOW64MacromedFlash
I'm pretty suspicious that this is the cause of my problem, that some web app is invoking one of these and Poser prefers the other.  I can see why I have two, because I'm running XP 64, and the 32-bit version is provided for legacy support, but I wonder if I really really need it.  I'd like some advice on which of these is preferred - Bagginsbill I know you already said 10, if you could give this some thought I'd really appreciate it.  I am willing to try disabling one of these to see if it kills my problem, although Adobe is kinda like ninjas, sneaking this stuff in quietly with other patches so it might get resurrected.  Thanks.

Actually, it isn't provided for legacy support. It's provided because there is no such thing as a 64-bit Flash player. This is a serious problem that Adobe refuses to answer.

That is why Poser Pro 2010 had to have a standalone library for the 64-bit version of Poser. It is not possible to use the embedded Flash player in a 64-bit application, because there is no such thing.

---

Renderosity forum reply notifications are wonky. If I read a follow-up in a thread, but I don't myself reply, then notifications no longer happen AT ALL on that thread. So if I seem to be ignoring a question, that's why. (Updated September 23, 2019)