Ugh, I haven't even read this whole thread, but I'm locking it. 

I hate to BLATANTLY take sides, but when someone proves OVER AND OVER the need for a technique, and shows the correct way to do it, OVER AND OVER, 

ATTACKING HIM FOR POSTING IT AND THEN TELLING HIM TO PROVE IT IS THE DUMBEST ARGUMENT I HAVE EVER SEEN.

I am absolutely tired of the unnecessary bickering and trolling over something as NOT LIFE THREATENING as Gamma Correction.  If you have a problem with the way someone presents a technique or theory, instead of attacking bagginsbill, OVER AND OVER and following him to every thread you can, PROVE him wrong if you can.  Write your own process.  Figure it out for yourself.  

In the end, I will suggest, if you don't like someone in the forum, STAY THE HECK AWAY FROM THEM.  I am going to HEAVILY petition to the programmers for an ignore button to go along with the report post button, but, until then, if you can't act like an adult, at least act like a teenager and IGNORE EACH OTHER.

Sitemail | Freestuff | Craftythings | Youtube|

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it into a fruit salad.