I've read lesbentley's advice in other threads about removing that number in the CR2 to make it superconfirming. I haven't been able to make that work. Also, I have some superconforming clothing straight from the vendor, examined before loading,  that has the number where les says there should be none. So I think vendors are using different methods of making a piece of clothing superconforming. I have seen some clothing that even has (hidden) SC versions of every morph.

The frustrating thing is, I have yet to see a vendor state up front that re-saving the clothing to the library (as many, many people do, even if only to give it a new name) will kill the superconforming function.  A vital piece of information for the consumer, I would think.