Quote - Also Les.. might your idea not work in PP2010? I removed all instances of (in this case) :9 - and the thing didn't turn superconforming anyway :(

Did you remove the figure number from the "Figure 9" line in the ERC code, as well?  If that's still present, I don't think the superconforming would work.

Apparently recent Poser updates have been introducing a new method of loading library figures to conform with morphs, and this can sometimes (IIRC)  interfere with the old superconforming methods.   Conflicts with this new process apparently arise if any kind of Python method is used to load the figures.

===========================sigline======================================================

Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking.  He apologizes for this.  He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.

Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below.  His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.