tom271 opened this issue on Oct 07, 2010 · 28 posts
Quest posted Thu, 07 October 2010 at 12:49 PM
The premise is that you don’t have to pay the $75 annual fee if you don’t want to but know that a heavy fine will be incurred if you should be unfortunate enough to have a fire on your property requiring that service. It is only fair since it would be an imposition to the city’s resources.