acrionx opened this issue on Oct 05, 2010 · 394 posts
moogal posted Sun, 10 October 2010 at 5:03 PM
Quote - Religious people often say that science has the burden of proving that there is no God - no, the religious has the burden of proving that there is a God, heaven, hell, and everything else we cannot see, and all they seem to have are the writings of people who didn't know a whole lot about how things worked back then.
Right, religion predates science. That's why it's up to science to disprove god. Before science, religion didn't have need for proof of god. Only if religion had arrived after science would it need proof of god to base its claims on.