also wanted to mention that it's cruel to argue with believers about the existence of god and
whether their theories are wrong, as it always comes down to lack of evidence, but astrophysicists
have the opposite problem: there's a plethora of data and evidence, but they continue to mis-
interpret and "dumb it down" in order to get funding from their secular money sources.

e.g. the 'big bang' theory.  the theorists exist in a culture dominated by religion, which is reflected
in their absurd ideations about how the universe was somehow created ex nihilo, and their concept
of linear time forces them to believe that the universe has a beginning and an end.

hence we might have a theoretical physicist apologising for his deficiencies: yes, the big bang implies
items in the universe are expanding away from each other, but we can observe galaxies colliding.
yes, we have a big bang and a universe consisting of various particles and forces, but we can't
account for 70 - 90% of what should be there.  so please give us another few billions of currency
units that might otherwise go to feeding the homeless, caring for the sick, or other trivia.