RobynsVeil opened this issue on Dec 03, 2010 · 409 posts
RobynsVeil posted Thu, 23 December 2010 at 4:10 PM
Quote - Which was exactly what was found earlier. The default 0.1 is to low, 0.7 is a better estimate. Again, Cloth Room is not; Clothes Room. The defaults are for clothing a table or covering a car, not for dressing a figure.
Extremely interesting. So, may I conclude that the cloth room is not at a state of perfection Sm would like to think it is for the purposes it has reported been designed: clothing humanoid figures? No wonder SM isn't listening to you. Others have been over this ground before with SM, with about as much success as you. I do want to thank you for making the effort to talk to them: this was precisely the point of this thread: to get savvy users to bring Cloth Room's issues to light and point them out to SM. Because of the inherent difficulty of the interface, too many users gave up trying to make sense of it and so the underlying functional issues that you are uncovering never came to light. The fact that artists like Laurie and Grappo are able to make use of this unreliable mechanism speaks volumes of their paitence and skills, not of the mechanism itself.
Thank you so, so much for this hard work, aRTBee! You deserve much credit for your preserverance and strength of sense of purpose!
Monterey/Mint21.x/Win10 - Blender3.x - PP11.3(cm) - Musescore3.6.2
Wir sind gewohnt, daß die Menschen verhöhnen was sie nicht verstehen
[it is clear that humans have contempt for that which they do not understand]