EClark1894 opened this issue on Jan 12, 2011 · 193 posts
pjz99 posted Wed, 12 January 2011 at 2:40 PM
Nobody's stopping you (any of you)... Certain syndromes like this, the main responsibility goes to the buyers. Here's a good example:
http://sharecg.com/v/46985/view/Poser/V4-Morphs++-Loader-Poses
http://sharecg.com/v/46955/view/Poser/M4-Morphs++-Loader-Poses
These two items are functionally identical, took the same work, have the same appearance, do the same thing etc. One of them has been downloaded 224 times and is rated 5/5 by 3 people. The other has been downloaded 117 times and is (inexplicably) rated 1/5 by one person. They took the same amount of work to do, and the work cannot be re-used. People can argue about quality standards or design preferences or whatever, but this is pretty black and white 1:1 parity.