Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Antonia - Opinions?

odf opened this issue on Oct 27, 2008 · 13933 posts


Cage posted Thu, 17 February 2011 at 4:47 PM

Quote - Wait! On second thought, maybe it would be better to go back to a numbering scheme similar to what we had before Antonia 1.0.0. That would be more consistent with potential future releases, and it would make diagnosing problems with mixed versions easier. So how about these names: Antonia-1.0

AntoniaA-1.0

Antonia-lo-1.0
AntoniaA-lo-1.0

These would be the names for the .obj and .cr2 files (with .obj and .cr2 appended, obviously), and also the figure names.

I would find that preferable, myself.  I already have several development .pz3 files accrued since the release of 1.0, and I wasn't looking forward to changing .obj paths in these once 1.0.1 is released.

 

Quote - @Cage, Is it OK if I post your "morph_slot_maker1g.py" on Antonia's Free site? Have you any thoughts on the issue of adding channels via py scripts? Will your script run on a Mac?

Am I off on one of my wild fantasies, or is this a viable alternative to PBMCC?

I have been using this script for my own personal use, and absolutely love it, but I don't know how it would go down with the general public.

 

By all means, upload the script.  As far as I know the script should be Mac compatible.

It is true, however, that the script won't help D|S users at all.  :sad:  So if it's a viable alternative for anything, that's true only for Poser users.

You can upload that pose adjustment script too, if you ever want to.  :laugh:

===========================sigline======================================================

Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking.  He apologizes for this.  He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.

Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below.  His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.