greatlights opened this issue on Mar 10, 2011 · 84 posts
Cage posted Thu, 10 March 2011 at 10:36 PM
Quote - So many poser artists are using this software to make pornographic scenes.
What is your opinion?
You'll find plenty of that kind of thing in any medium. Computer art? Yup. Paintings? Yes. Mosaics? Check. Drawings? Definintely. Drawings of stick figures? Yes, indeed. Written language? Yes. Spoken language? Most certainly. And so on. People are people, people are sexual beings.
I think it's kind of neat that these porno-producing people have a creative/expressive medium like Poser open to them. I've seen plenty of Poser-spawned pornography, and my overall response to it is, "Meh." Except for the Poser-porn I've made myself. :lol: So: Everyone's Poser porn sucks, except for mine. :tt2:
(Did I use that tongue-waggling smiley correctly? I've always wanted to use it somewhere. :lol:)
===========================sigline======================================================
Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking. He apologizes for this. He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.
Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below. His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.