Attached Link: http://faerieguild.com

Just thought I would put my two coppers in here, mainly because I didn't like what I saw in some of the posts above. First off I am a mother of a beautiful 1 year old boy, and as a mother it makes me sick to hear or see someone who advocates it. However I am not against nudity. It's totally natural to be nude, why do you think you were born that way? If it was wrong to be nude you would have been born with clothes. The real concern I have is that child porn or art in general is subjective. It offends me to hear peoples posts above imply that the people in the Faerie community advocate/make child porn. The Faerie artwork on my site contains mostly nude Faeries. Yes they are thin and yes they have small delicate features (don't all faeries?), that does not make them children/teens. Are we to suppose now that all thin women or flat chested women are children or teens? If you're going to assume that you would also have to assume that men who like thin women are really men that like little children/teens. Here's a quote from this forum: "You know, some of the fairy art I've seen here and in other forums can come very close to being classified as child porn, [snip] really depict underage teens under the guise of fairies." So now we have "underage" poser models, you've got to be kidding. What the above statement says to me is that there are sickos out there that see pictures of slender women and think about teen girls. A side note: the one picture on my website that could be considered a pornographic picture is of a voluptous Vargas-Olivia stlye pin-up. If my Faerie pictures were really just guises for child porn why wouldn't my pin-up be of a "teen".