ice-boy opened this issue on Apr 25, 2011 · 111 posts
wolf359 posted Fri, 29 April 2011 at 10:32 AM
"Whatever they come up with, I gotta see skin before I'm impressed. It's all about Vicky. I really don't care if the temple is the photo-spitting image of Mayan architecture if she doesn't look luscious"
Interesting ,While one can Appreciate your honesty on the matter of vicky
I find it rather sad that both programs (DS&Poser) have been reduced somewhat
to being a platform for ONE Naked Female model.
Daz has the advantage of having been able to build their entire program& Content regime around ubiquitous V-Chick and thus can introduce modern industry standard innovation going forward
While SM plays the part of the poor cousin trying to stay compatible while clinging to vestigial, cobbled together legacy code from the 1990's.
I remember one person saying how he was ready to move on to Autodesk 3D MAX
for better...well everything
but alas the on thing that held him back was losing a fully functional V-Chick.
One can only speculate on where DS&Poser might be today absent the dominance of this ONE model and here loyal worshippers
lastly I think posers node based Material System has not been the boon many thought it would be in fact I personally think that node based mat rooms in general are becoming less & less relevant in light of the new breeds of GPU/CPUrender engines and their preset material structures.
Cheers*** ***