Wow, all this controversy over some binary code - how utterly sad that we are all discussing the state of some electronic signals that we have manipulated, and made skins for. Naked is not porn, giving my 1 year old son a bath is not stimulating to me,( if it is to anyone else then I agree they need help ) I suppose some people think that a child nursing is CP, but I certinally don't.We are all born nude and most of us look much better nude than we do with our ratty shirts and baggy pants falling off our rears. If this was to be passed how many artists ( famous or not ) would then be considered Child Pornographers simply because they drew a nude child or teen in a natural non-lewd setting? - or drew sketches of such? Porn on the other hand - the showing of the actual acts - is disgusting and should be stopped. But, to make all people suffer a penalty because one person in a thousand got offended is rediculous. It sad when we are all so politacally correct that we feel we must bend over backwards so as not to offend even the slightest little bit any person, creature or idea. I wonder when the coaltion for the rights of roaches is going to start protesting Raid commercials?? As for the looks like children or teens thing, come on who wants to render old naked hags?? I've seen some 30 year olds that looked younger than my 7 year old. And fairys?? come on- they are mythical and almost always portrayed as nude females, how can you possibly feel that is CP, did we have some bad experiences with out fairy tale books?? And for that matter how many people have downloaded Thorne's models, and then want to complain about his work, and work derived from his work, thats hypocritical and ungrateful and if I were him I would consider pulling my work from here and giving/selling it on my own site. Seems to me some people out there saw something that made them have a errant thought and they felt guilty for having it and now must wage a holy war against the evils of colored pixils. Faerie Advocate: http://faerieguild.com :)