Forum: Complaint & Debate


Subject: "Virtual Child Pornography" - FYI

HARBINGER-3D opened this issue on Aug 17, 2001 ยท 98 posts


Derty posted Sat, 18 August 2001 at 3:39 AM

"What's wrong with "old naked hags"??? Wheren't we all born naked (as you stated)?? Why is it that only the so-called "perfect" body has the right to be shown naked??" First off I believe art is about beauty, and so I personally won't be rendering, painting, or drawing, any "old hags" but to each their own. Secondly I was only trying to add some humor to this pixel war. Being abused as a child myself, I realize the seriousness of the whole child abuse subject, but I think you are all straying away from what this is really about. I'm sure that most of your parents probably have nude pictures of you playing in the bathtub when you were children, and I'm sure they have shown it to your friends and loved ones, and I'm also pretty sure that it never crossed their mind that it could be somehow misconstrued as being pornographic. That is one of the many points I'm trying to get across. What I still don't understand is how this topic has turned into being about abuse when I've yet to see any pictures on renderosity, or renderotica that depict ANY sort of lewdness, pornography, or abuse of children. All I'm saying is that if I want to make a texture for a nude child I should be able to do so without going to jail, or having to look over my shoulder for the angry villagers with pitchforks. Also I would like to add that I totally agree with fozzibear for saying "As far as I think, people who defile and abuse children should be branded and thrown naked into the street."