wolf359 opened this issue on May 04, 2011 · 33 posts
moriador posted Tue, 10 May 2011 at 2:43 AM
Quote - > Quote - > Quote - Or maybe I'm not prepared to throw much support behind a product made by a company which omits gentials from figures because of moralistic considerations. :lol:
It may be worse than that. I heard Daz was considering implementing content filters into DS4, such that "inappropriate" content could not be loaded onto certain figures. For example, fetish wear on child figures. I understand it was just a suggestion for which they were requesting feedback. But my, my, does it tell you a lot about their corporate culture!
The suggestion on which they were asking for views was an [i]optional[/i] filtering system that users could use if they wished.
Well, optional is great. But why on earth would I want to prevent myself from using certain items with certain figures? Someone who buys erotic clothing and props with the intention of using them with child figures is not going to turn on the option at all, are they? So what's the point?
And if I'm worrying about my kids using it... ah, um, are kids really that keen on making sexual and inappropriate images of children? Is that really something that keeps parents up at night with worry?
I mean, I'm sorry. I am just not worried that some pedophile is going to break into my home, log onto my computer, and render pictures of kids in latex body suits. I'm just not. I'm sorry. The whole idea is so absurd, I can't help laughing while I type this.
PoserPro 2014, PS CS5.5 Ext, Nikon D300. Win 8, i7-4770 @ 3.4 GHz, AMD Radeon 8570, 12 GB RAM.