Attached Link: Paq Wak gets his license revoked for complaining about a bug

> Quote - Ok, I've never used the SLG, I've only used the OpenCL version of Lux. > > But upon readin about SmallLuxGPU, what caught my eye was: > > > Quote - Currently (as of January 2011) SLG isn't under development because the current focus is on integrating GPU support to LuxRender. As the program is experimental and was never intended to be a finished product you may run into problems in the beginning, in that case please refer to the forum and this Wiki. > > It does look impressive in speed compared to the OpenCL version, but is it right to compare something that was an experiment and is no longer under development against something that is under development?

Of course they were going to stop development of smallluxgpu and integrate it into luxrender.  So what?  Given that smallluxgpu 1.6 is what is currently integrated into luxrender, (correct?),  and that smallluxgpu 2.0 will be, I don't see the problem here.

 

Quote - I may be slightly biased in some perspective, but if something works and is faster, I'm not one to disregard it. I would definitely use SLG, and it would give me a reason to do more in Blender...

 

I've attached another reason to disregard Octane to this post, and I don't see a problem with non-members seeing the thread.  Paq Wak complained about a bug that "radiance" couldn't fix, so "radiance" revoked his license and refunded his money.  He was better off than me, I didn't get any money back.

 

Quote - Hell, i may download it anyways just to play around since it does look promising.

 

And the next version of smallluxgpu, as a part of luxrender itself is going to have MLT.