Huolong, I agree with you and I am somewhat surprised that you should think that "defense of Child Pornography" was or is my intention. Perhaps I can illustrate that by starting the ball rolling with an introduction to a set of guidelines and the first of those guidelines. I would be surprised if anyone disagrees with the sentiments behind what follows, but you may think the wording or details could be improved. You may think that I have not gone far enough. Ok, this is only the first guideline and only a draft. Please let me know what you would change and what you would add. Guidelines for posting of acceptable computer generated images. Indtroduction Computer generated images made by programs such as Poser (CuriousLabs) can appear to be very life-like. The following guidelines exist to maintain a level of decency in these images that is within the Law and within standards acceptable to Society in general. It must be understood that no actual persons, other than the artist, are involved in the creation of such images. Therefore, terms such as "age", "child" and "individual" should be understood in the context of their creation from "polygon meshes" and "textures". They are virtual objects and not real people. Guidelines. 1) Images should not show: (a) individuals below the age of majority (18 years old)engaged in explicit sexual activity, individually, with other persons or with animals, (b) individuals below the age of majority (18 years old) bound and/or gagged in a sexual context, (c) individuals below the age of majority (18 years old) tortured or otherwise physically abused in a sexual context, (d) explicit views of the pubic area of individuals below the age of majority (18 years old) in a sexual context. So, what do you think? Isaac