Jaager wrote: >>>> PJF, your attack on site policy and in particular, its personnel is unfair and uncalled for. <<<< Unfair and uncalled for? It's in a thread created for doing the same friggin thing! Didn't notice you whining about it then. >>>> Advertizing copy is a strange place to be taking a stand on Bill of Rights issues. I don't remember mentioning the 'Bill of Rights', but thanks for putting words in my mouth. Renderosity can have any kind of requirements on advertising design it likes - but if they are astoundingly stupid I'll always be happy to mention it. This is one of those occasions. >>> A policy has become necessary... <<< Only by virtue of a self instigated panic. No new laws have been passed, no advertising at Renderosity has transgressed established (child-porno) laws. blud wrote: >>> Go to the source of the problem not the periphery. <<< Part of the problem is people rolling over and accepting this minority interest extremist crap and saying things like 'just keep your head down'. Extremism always gets its foothold when the level-headed sit and do nothing, expecting it to go away. It doesn't go away, it just gets bigger until you make it go away. Still, all this is hilariously funny and illustrates that 'Online Graphic Artist's Community' is rapidly becoming a misnomer for Renderosity, which is falling over itself to be a timid little shop operating at the lowest common denominator of, so called, 'family values'.