ghosty12 opened this issue on Oct 15, 2011 · 252 posts
coldrake posted Sun, 16 October 2011 at 3:26 PM
RobynsVeil wrote:
Quote - Oh, Phantom3D likes my contributions...I've got two matmatic tutorials accessible to users at his site. No one makes childish comments: it's all about the furtherance of our goals. He's the best rigger ever. I'm so grateful to be able to log on there and contribute. V4 re-rigged: this is going to be awesome.
Excellent! I'm glad you found a new favorite site.
Netherworks wrote:
Quote - Much of the antiquation of Poser technology has been to try and bring a balance between DS and Poser. We have had to settle for ignoring much of Poser's technology to reach a common ground by using "Poser 4" features so that things can work in both programs.
I always thought of it as being the other way around.
Netherworks wrote:
Quote - DAZ is making an effort only as long as the trail leads back to using DS4. This is not an optimal or desired situation for everyone. My personal thoughts is that this is less about giving back to the community or making an effort to support Poser and more about control and a requirement to keep DAZ Studio in the pipeline when using Genesis/V5.
I'll have to completely disagree. DAZ wanted from the beginning for Poser to have full support for Genesis. DAZ provided a way to get full functionality for Genesis in Poser without using a DAZ Studio pipeline, Smith Micro chose not to use it. I admit Smith Micro chose not to for a legitimate business reason. But to say that DAZ has chosen to only offer support through DAZ Studio is wrong. Without the functionality DAZ offered Smith Micro, Poser simply isn't capable at this point of using Genesis to it's full extent.
Coldrake