Quote - > Quote - I mean, then Pose2Lux would be obsolete because we could still use Blender as bridge? If Cycles eats XML, why not a Pose2Cycles?

 

 

Well at this point cycles is only available as an integrated renderer of blender 2.6
So there is No "stand alone" version that accepts XML files and I know of no plans to release on from the Author of Cycles.
I personally think a Blender based plugin that reads the PZ3 format would be the best solution as this is what we have with the
INTERPOSER PRO
plugin for cinema where I just access my runtime and load ALL poser  directly from within Cinema4D and from there repose ,remorph ,recloth etc. and render it in C4D's native AR3,Vray or even Maxwell.

Cheers

I agree. A direct Poser scene to Blender would be awesome. And since both programs use Python, I don't see a reason why it can't be done well. Shame I'm no programmer ;).

Laurie

 

When the Poser to Lux was proposed, I sugested that a Poser to Blender would be more apropiated since once in Blender there would be a lot more posibilities (Lux, Yafaray, Blender internal, POV, and so on) I asked people to test Blender to see this  posibility and some people almost kill me :-S don't you remember that Laurie ;-) I'm really happy that your allergy to Blender got better. LOL