drifterlee opened this issue on Nov 02, 2011 · 273 posts
wolf359 posted Wed, 09 November 2011 at 6:52 PM
**
**
**
**
"Reason why Apollo failed was because it was difficult to use"
I found the figure easy to use in general but Apollo had had major anatomical
Flaws that in his core topography
(Entire human muscle groups missing) and a face that was very hard to make look different from his
puffy default.
and despite fancy forum banners beneath the posts of his loyalists
and an erstwhile Daz Mike3 that himself was an anatomical step backwards from M2,
Apollo failed.
it seems, to me at least, in this tiny figure market you can only beat something with something else that is substantially BETTER
not merely substantially Different or "not from Daz"
"I seriously doubt that a solution which involves constant usage of a another 3rd party program will succeed with Poser users"
Vue has done pretty well as "Third party solution" for those poser users not satisfied with firefly
and how many pages Deep is the poser to LUX thread?
poser user have a long history of using third party programs as part of their workflow
the only difference now is that some will have to get over their tribal/partison,emotional
aversion to using the program from the "Evil empire"
Cheers