Quote - I only jumped in and stated this, because I was in a unique position to kind of help squash that rumor...

So, in the interest of elimionating any more egregious rumors, my additional questions for DAZ (NOT IgnatusSerpentis) are:

• What is your public position on brokered content?  Do you want more V4/M4 submissions?  Will you be accepting submissions for non DAZ figures?  (I concede that this one is based on the rumor that DAZ will not accept brokered items for Poser and 3rd party figures not brokered by DAZ.) Are you encouraging DAZ content developers including your own brokered artists to spend more time on Genesis?   I thought I knew the answer to these, but since my statements are referred to by one of your supporters as egregious (which means colloquially., outrageous or prone to error.)   Is it merely a rumor that you are seeking brokered artists to develop for Genesis rather than continue to invest in the V4/M4 line?    (I do have multiple posts in my files from your PA manager that seem to indicate a preference--let's use this as an opportunity for DAZ to clearly state their preferences in open discourse.)
   
• As you are undoubtly aware, developing content for Genesis has been a signifcant challenge with the new technologies.  Do you feel that the lack of compatibility technologies between DS4 and P9 (see my previous post for a citation of a few of the compatibility issues) are somewhat forcing PAs to choose direction?  Do you feel additional compatibility technologies should be given higher priority to reduce this effort and make it possible for PAs to easily deliver content for both DS4 and Poser platforms?   DAZ is, after all,  has been well known for many years as a tool maker for content for both platforms (FST now CCT for example).  
   
• Will CCT be improved to more easily and readily generate poser-ready content, as FST had been in the past?   (While I agree CCT has subsumed most, if not all, FST tools, several tools do not generate, at this point, poser-usable content.)

-K