DAZ_Rand opened this issue on Dec 09, 2011 · 1133 posts
vilters posted Sat, 24 December 2011 at 9:50 AM
Rhetorical question?
Do we really want the poser code that seems quite stable now, to be polluted with other code for just this one figure/system?
That, as all other figures in the past, will have a usabiliy life expectance of 3 to 4 years?
And then what? Again a battle like this one?
I would much more like SM to provide a new quality Poser family using their latest in-house technologies.
And to DAZ to provide a stand alone Poser compatble Genesis.
Poser 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7,
P8 and PPro2010, P9 and PP2012, P10 and PP2014 Game
Dev
"Do not drive
faster then your angel can fly"!