ProPose001 No that's just typical windows BS. I get that for all installers not just DAZ's.

"Actually it's all supposition. The update process could be all push, from the store, with the user then choosing what to install. The CMS may be used to avoid bothering users with update notices for things that aren't installed, but it needn't be and we currently don't know how the system is planned to work (still less what will survive the implementation stages)."

True, I did give fair warning.

You couldn't have a thread on the DAZ forum about the virtual store. You can hardly mention DSF with out it getting deleted. Infer that CMS is more then just your content sorting friend and poof. No there are subjects other then religen, politics, or app wars that can't be discussed on the DAZ forum.

I have no use for CMS, don't need it, don't want it, have no intention of leaving it installed.

I did say I'd like to believe DAZ isn't foolish enough not to offer another option. I like working in runtimes, they are just far more well organized then a studio content folder. And 99% of my content is already  in runtimes.

And yes, it is too early to imply much about what the virtual store may be, which is the perfect time to prevent it form becoming something most people will hate.