I cant really say that I agree with that.  I would say that Anastasia offers a more detailed morph.  Not exactly more realistic.  Perhaps if photos we see in magazines and whatnot were realistic.  The fact is that those "unattainably perfect" shots we see of models and what not are heavily edited and in themselves are not overly 'realistic'.. Stylized and Idealized would probably be a better description.  Dont get me wrong, I love the morph and BH did an amazing job, but she is really only as realistic as any other pinup poster girl that you ever see.  Much like alice and previous GNDs, which I also loved, but never expect to see any biological examples that come close to matching.

I think I do get your point though, it sure would be nice to see Antonia with the sculpting you see in Anastasia's ankles, calves and back.  

 

Quote - I consider myself likely to be a fairly average end-user: I'm not going to make any content, and I'm probably not going to create my own morphs, or even modify existing ones. So I will rely on what merchants provide for me, and I will judge the available figures and add-ons by what appears in promo images and galleries.

So far, Anastasia appears to have a more realistic (albeit unattainably "perfect") set of body morphs than the morphed versions of Antonia. But Anastasia's face, particularly her lack of deep eyelids, makes her less than useful for me. Antonio seems to have a much more useable face, but her body morphs don't look particularly human to me.

As a result, I won't use either one of them until more base content (face morphs for Anastasia that give her eyelids, for instance) arrives.

I emphasize that my views on these figures are based entirely on renders I have seen. That is, after all, the only way I can judge a figure before I've purchased it.

I'm waiting to see what happens. I'm probably not alone. But I will say this: the more a figure and related content appear in galleries in various sites, the more likely I am to want it.