Quote - > Quote - Also PP2012 uses up to 25% of physical memory for its cache.

I noticed that as well. Reason I returned it. My machine is at it's max memory, I cannot afford to lose that much memory and I'm sure not prepared to buy a new machine just because of Poser. While PP2012 has advantages, it comes at a price, one too high for me.

Poser 8/PP2010 does the same thing. PoserPro has a different caching mechanism and can use even more. But memory not used is memory wasted, especially if you replace it with reading each texture from disk each time it is used.