in all fairness aRtBee  i think that is splitting hairs

"Next to that, I find the no-postwork as well as the "see what the progam is capable of" both rather vague. Firefly calculates results per materials channel and per light, and adds them up. When I get all results out as separate render passes and blend them together myself, it's postwork. And I do see every day in the galleries what the program is capable of",

I thought that earlierr in the thread it had been made clear what the criteria for postwork was, ie: once an image has rendered.....if we scrap firefly render, python, shaders, skins, textures from the equation we might just as well post everything in the photoshop gallery.....and are you seeing what the program can do, or what the other programs can do that apparently enhance what poser does so appallingly according to opinion posted here, it makes me wonder why there are so many users, they can't all be modellers and texture makers....

on your point about posting, surely it would be up to you which gallery you thought the image most suited to, I can't be held responsible for someone elses decision making by my suggestion surely?

just playing devils advocate really, and waiting for my renders to complete.........

 for the life of me I can't see why people are so against the idea, it's not as if anyone is demanding self rule lol,

OS: Windows7 64-bit Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2430M CPU @ 2.40GHz, 2401 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)  6GB Ram
Poser: Poser Pro 2012 SR3.1 ...Poser 8.........Poser5 on a bad day........
Daz Studio Pro 4.5  64bit

Carrara beta 8.5

Modelling: Silo/Hexagon/Groboto V3
Image Editing: PSP V9/Irfanview
Movie Editing. Cyberlink power director/Windows live movie maker

"I live in an unfinished , poorly lit box, but we call it home"

My freestuff   

 link via my artist page