Coleman opened this issue on May 05, 2012 · 171 posts
Glitterati3D posted Sun, 06 May 2012 at 3:27 PM
Quote - I put myself in the place of the end user that does NOT have Internet.
The fellow that does not, or can not come to the forums at will.For those, Poser should be "more user friendly";
"More complete."Things like object editor, cr2 editor, are just examples of what can/could/should be incuded in the app and in the manual.
Lights, poses, mat room, all can be learned by experimenting.
The problems arise when one has to dig into a file to get something done.
Just my 2 cents.
I agree ; Great renders come from great artists with great imagination.
But the technical side should/could become simpler if more of these tools where included in Poser.OK, most users have broadband Internet, but not all.
I still remember my days on dial up.One could build a full next version of Poser, not by adding "new" stuff, but by adding all existing stuff into one complete application.
Dreaning on about uvmapper, matarial manager, and so on, and so on.Buy Poser, go to a lonely island, and be able to do it all.
Without the need to go out on the Net and search "extra"s to do all tech stuff.My other 2 cents :-)
What most POSER users want is to create ART. They have no desire to load, pose and render. Internet or not, you are talking about a program that takes ART one step further for ARTISTS.
I don't care if it's animation, still renders or web site design.......Poser users want something not canned. It's what brings them to Poser to begin with.