Quote - Yep, I know your not picking a fight, but it is an interesting thing to get people views.

:D

Quote - Now, here I go with a little assumption of my own.

Could it be that those that have a problem with younger users using poser and seeing a naked figure would have problems explaining about the consequences of seeing that naked body.

I have a Great niece that is just over 2 and when she is old enough to ask certain questions, she will be told in a way that she will understand about that question.. None of that, errrr come back in a few years type of thing.

So, perhaps it is down to the parents to talk to their children.

Possibly that, but also the legal ramifications of granting underage access to potentially anatomically correct dolls that can be made to do most anything with most anything, including beastiality if one uses the default animals.  I would think adults who could discuss nudity and such might still have a problem with the potential harm.  Creating a child-friendly runtime means deleting potentially "dangerous" stuff which, unless the parent keeps their stuff under password protection, could just as easily be restored to the youngster's library if so desired.

Quote - Plus we do know that when M4 or V4 loads up they are not naked at all, the have 2nd skin clothing on them. So, it would be easy to set up a runtime that only had specific items in it if parents had a problem with them.

More opinions sort and listend to with interest.

This I did not know, as I do not have those figures yet.  Since I am still learning the fundamentals of clothing, I tend to load Posette into the studio and body paint what I want her to "wear."  As such, I am frequently looking at her nekkid from many angles and (re)painting her wobbly bits, so I can see where someone might not want an underage person doing the same.