I use some complicated shaders for very specific effects, and I and others have tried and failed to replicate the desired effect with GC-compatible shaders.  Until there's a way to make the transition to GC more accessible, I can't use it.  So I definitely prefer the non-GC for my own work.  I've seen what it can do in more capable hands, however, and I know from that how impressive GC can be.  Right now I feel like it isn't quite ready yet and it's one of those frustratingly tricky new features, like the Morph Brush in the early days.  It took a few versions to get the Morph Brush into a consistently useful and accessible state.  I have hopes that GC will follow a similar pattern somehow.  :unsure:

===========================sigline======================================================

Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking.  He apologizes for this.  He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.

Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below.  His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.