LaurieA opened this issue on Jun 15, 2012 · 426 posts
who3d posted Sun, 17 June 2012 at 11:06 AM
Quote - I think it may have something to do with Studio's auto-fitting and smoothing settings, you don't usually want the nipples and navel to affect how clothing fits unless it's an ultra skin-tight suit, so it's safer just to let you choose when to make them visible or not (plus you can adjust the parameter values of each if they have dials).
Ah - that'd be why it doesn't have a navel by default either. Imagine the mess that could make of clothing as the shape auto-morphs {shudder}
Quote - A quick question Cliff, If I drop this out now as a OBJ, repeat with the V5 option, can I load them back into the base version and do a morph version that now has a V4 and V5 fit?
If I read you right - no, because it's not the mesh that's changed but the rigging - despite how it actually looks in Poser. Did you have fun with the clothing before applying the script? I have to confess that the first time I ran the script and it had that effect on a top, pants, boots and hair all in one go I literally laughed out loud. To see that... mess coalesce into a (reasonably) consistent clothed figure was a delight that first time. I'm SO glad I was alone when the scripts reached that stage, as otherwise I suspect people would have looked at me quite strangley! It was definately one of those "YES!" moments :)
It's a pity that not all content behaves as well as that top - some hair and pants in particular can be troublesome for reasons outside the scope of the existing python routines. Good to see you having fun though!
Cheers,
Cliff