Quote - ACTA was rejected by the EU until now. The aceptance of ACTA would mean that the copyright laws in the EU would be exactly the US laws and this was rejected by the European population.

Nope. Rejected by the EU government not the people :)

Actually the EU still is Democratic so the Folk decide as the govenment fallows them , People are govenment, compaired to the US in witch the People do as the Govenment say's. ( Sheep Folk ) 

A good example is the ACTA issue witch almost caused a Civil war in the US. and government beating the crap out of innocent civillians just because they stud for there own thoughts.

 

Quote - IPoser is illegal in Saudi Arabia.
Really? Thats interesting. Where did you read that?

  this is common Logic ... as those from the mentioned caunties can not get the merchandise in a legal way , and it would be a crime to sell a product onto a cauntry witch prohibits the usage Stores in most cases do not offer a product sale to those.

the people there also to protect them selves form a govenment check on there spendings are forced to go to the Dark side to get the whanted merchandise.

but this actually concerns the trading contracts between caunties.

each product has to be adapted to the cautries Law in witch it has been exported and there is no exuse of unknoweledge ( Export Laws)

Now if for example Kidds4 would be declared as a Pedophile Product throughout different cauntries in Europ DAZ would comit a Crime providing this figure to those Cautries. ( Ignorance is Bliss .. but not an excuse )

As for V4 WM how many people who whanted this to get true figured a way of Borrowing this from the Copyrightholder without hes full permission and it has been sucessfully done without allot of concequences. If it concerns a personal Product by the copyrightholder he mostly Barks out Loud but only to represent hes own thought of right.

Another example : One produces an Iron GYM puts it out on the Market on a 100$ as soon as he makes allot of sales others will fallow by copiing the Idea and they are allowed to do as sutch the form will varrie a little and especially the name or Brand , witch is the actuall copyright so those cant use the Name Iron Gym but will name the Product Pullup Gym and sell the Product to a lower Price.

Now the consumer , he will see the flood of the cheeper copy but still think well the originall might be better quality. if affordable still by the originall Product.

the Inventor does not bother about the Issue as they do not stand still fixing them selves on an old Idea rather use there energy for there next revolutionary Idea.

If ,as a sample, a great creator Like Aery Soul , and later on somone pops up  and makes the same style copying the idea people will still whant the Aery Soul Product as they are the Originall. or Steam Punk how manny Vendors fallowes the Idea as they smelled Big Monney. But who is the actuall copyrightholder of the Brand " Steam Punk " ???