durf opened this issue on Jul 20, 2012 · 114 posts
operaguy posted Mon, 23 July 2012 at 2:15 AM
Wrong: there is an element of "poser sucks" in the first post and a repeat of the insistance further along that Poser should have these features or it is lame/sucks. you are in denial.
Meanwhile, there is no circling of the wagons about SP aleternatives, people are discussing alternatives, despite the opening ingratitude. and there is no "holy writ." I have been inquiring about Soft Body dynamics for years, and have had interaction with face-off about it. my attack is on the attitude of rude entitlement, not the exploration of the feature or the need for it.
I will repeat my contention, which you interpreted incorrectly: it is absurd to demand full softbody dynamics implementation [or else Poser sucks!] if you are creating stills that simply need a squish or deformation, including springback. You can do it now, while waiting for full-blown SB.
And expressing some respect for what the program can already do.
::::: Opera :::::