NanetteTredoux opened this issue on Aug 13, 2012 · 142 posts
SamTherapy posted Wed, 15 August 2012 at 8:39 AM
Sorry 'bout this, Teyon; I've been misunderstood so I need to clear it up. This is the last I'll say on the subject. In this thread. :)
All I'm saying is, a great texture on a manky mesh is the same as putting lipstick on a walrus and expecting it to look like Nigella Lawson.
As for Posette - the model is basically decent to start with - apart from the bending - and accepts morphs quite well.
Judy with V3 textures is still a damn ugly model with great textures but with the right morphs, it can look great.
A lousy texture on a great model doesn't detract as much as you'd expect, although it certainly doesn't enhance it. A surface, contrary to my buddy Vilters' assertion, is, IMO more than just the textures applied. It's the angles, planes, folds, bends and curves plus the texture.
Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum.