Quote - I stayed out of this, but since when does bondage equals porn? Besides, except for the odd render, art has always been the main objective.

Not about whether something equals porn, or if it's regarded as art by an individual. In this case, does the image go beyond the TOS?

Like I said, the TOS are worded in such a way that many images from a significant number of posters will break a strict interpretation of the TOS. Common sense and context needs to be applied and of that doesn't work, time for the big stick.