The post referred to there is the one that has been removed - I was trying to find it earlier to link in a thread on the DAZ forums. The link from the Forbes page is the same, and gives an error. That doesn't necessarily mean that the forum post was wrong or that Adobe won't say clearly that the applications are not for general use, it may simply be that they didn't want an unofficial announcement before the lawyers and PR people were done. The whole situation remains, for now, murky.