i hate to derail the topic by going back to the original question i've been chatting with other rendo members in a thread where realism is seen as the technical but not art worthy side of poser , but i think faces are just part of the problem, there are any number of real world (ish) morphs out there and of course there is dial spinning too, but unless you are just rendering a portrait, most face morphs don't come with a full realistic looking body morph, not talking eye candy, bikini babe, slutwear model, but real world, bit hippy, maybe a little extra weight in places it doesnt appear to obvious unless she wears something revealing. And then there is the clothing, how many outfits for a size 14 model, virtually none. I do mention morphs purely because in most instances they seem to be favoured by many due to the ease of application, click done.

It seems that many poser users, daz too, don't want to get realistic, in fact they veer away from it violently as if satan himself were leading the cause for realism, because they want to create pure fantasy, not a blend of real world and the ethereal. I guess it's the old question of who uses poser and why, and when the op says realistic, does he/she mean realistic attractive or realistic plain?, i think that is more the question.

OS: Windows7 64-bit Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2430M CPU @ 2.40GHz, 2401 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)  6GB Ram
Poser: Poser Pro 2012 SR3.1 ...Poser 8.........Poser5 on a bad day........
Daz Studio Pro 4.5  64bit

Carrara beta 8.5

Modelling: Silo/Hexagon/Groboto V3
Image Editing: PSP V9/Irfanview
Movie Editing. Cyberlink power director/Windows live movie maker

"I live in an unfinished , poorly lit box, but we call it home"

My freestuff   

 link via my artist page