"Are you thinking of a Facebook comment perhaps?"

Nup, it was there yesterday, and now it's gone.

Do we assume the right to review is conditional on proof of purchase and usage? The comment was based on the reviewer's use of Lux, which remains pertinent regardless of the Reality bridge.

I suppose the review was removed because it pertained more to Lux than Reality, and therefore not really a "product review". Splitting hairs concidering Reality is entirely 3rd party dependent on Lux. Don't like it when pertinent opinions are arbitrarily disapeared.