Cool!

I have a quick question about your EZPose set up using 'all tied up'. Did you rig the beam yourself and then apply the script to add the EZPose dials or did you do the whole rigging process with the scripts? The reason I asked is that I have ATU but have had mixed results with the resulting .cr2 from original model when I run the script to do the whole process. The problem being inconsistent, uneven groups for each bone being created by the script which results in tearing of the mesh at part seams when the figure is posed (not being a result of insufficient polys). Kind of like the scattershot results of auto-grouping... could probably be fixed by regrouping polys to each bone for cleanup I guess.

Anyway I'm working on some poseable antenna figures right now and the models are done, grouped, UV'd, and ready for rigging and after the rigging and joint adjustments are done I would like to add EP to the figures using ATU, which has the option of adding EP dials to an existing figure (as long as the figure is a straight tentacle or tail-like figure). I assume that I won't have the previous problem with ATU as I'm doing all of the rigging and grouping myself and simply using ATU as a means to add the ERC to the figure (as I am a Mac user I can't use Cr2edit or EZPose underground to add EPDials and have to rely on PoserPython for the task).

(I've contacted PhilC about this but there seems to be some mixup and he's not recieved my example meshes that I e-mailed him and I don't really feel like playing e-mail tag over this.)

Any thoughts or observations about your experiences with ATU? I apologize for the OT but you seem to be pretty helpful to folks here on the forum so I figured I'd ask. In any case, damned nice work on the ghostbusters themed attire and accessories!