amstar opened this issue on May 30, 2013 · 65 posts
amstar posted Thu, 30 May 2013 at 4:11 PM
Quote - > Quote - > Quote - sometimes the vendors are just making the previews "work safe".
are you saying huge big letter content warnings are not enough?
are you saying provocative clothed imagery (which is allowed) is worse than a simple back and front view of the skin texture?
are you saying the corporate world now dicates what every private person ought to be looking at?
are you saying society ought to be so ashamed what a real human being looks like?
are you saying bloody decaying zombies are "safer" than nipples on a woman or a penis on a man?
or maybe just explain what exactly is "unsafe" about a nude picture, I'd really like to know, because I don't understand!?
maybe some folks don't want to get fired for veiwing this stuff at work....sure there are options but they may not notice that.
sure you're going to get fired, what country do you live in??
you didn't read the above did you? do you think any of the other items are more valid?
that also doesn't get to the core of the issue with people being ashamed of who they are