Quote - I'm not yet sure what really happens if PML is used with new skinning.  With a bit luck the check is just overreacting. But its not easy to check. Many parts of the program are using the functions in question. My theory is that the figure skinning doesnt change the content of the figure, at least not morph-wise. You could make the morphs on a classic-skinned copy of your figures, and use the injection pose writer (and the new injection pose loader) script to copy the morph data into the figure with the unimesh skinning. Then you do not have to switch.

Hi Col,

I've been using a similar flow for PML in 2014 for Roxie (actually it was part of a flow I developed in the early days of PML so we didn't have to worry about .CR2 issues).

• Revert the figure to classic skinning.
• Do my PML work
• If I like the results, export the figure as a .obj use the "as morph" and "include body part names in polygon groups"
• Reload the .obj as morph with Netherwork's impressive "Morph Imp"

I'm probably being paranoid, but the same flow allows me consolidate multiple morphing sessions as well, which let's me create a "clean" morph.

Hopefully SM can get you fixed up so the "unimesh" skinning method doesn't present a barrier.

-K