Over the years in my paid profession, I have learned some important lessons. One being that no two people see the same thing alike, there are always differences between them due to the way we perceive things. This is rapidly turning into that. We can all agree that this is a good thing for the 3D community (Poser and DS), so what does it matter what her base figure looks like? We all know that beauty sells, so Dawn is going to load looking the best she can, and I have no issues with that. And like it has been said, if you don't like the shape, spin a dial or move a slider it is that easy! As an artist I want my 3D figures to conform to my version of perfect or as close as I can obtain given the software I use. Someone else may see my image and disagree, which we all have a right to do, but to sit here and to continue to argue over a point that we all know we will never be able to agree on is just plain silly. We have gone 61 pages without a serious issue and now we are going to get side tracked by a definition of "realistic"? No offense, but this is ridiculous. No matter what we can or can't agree on we have to all understand one basic thing, Dawn is being created to make a company money, and as the end users we will have SOME input to help them sell her better but I do not think her zero pose or base body shape will be one of those.

I am not saying this to flame or stir the pot, I am simply stating the facts as I see them. Others will disagree with me and that is fine I don't mind, but petty bickering over the correct or incorrect use of a word.....Come on.