Quote - > Quote - Pigeon holes again.  And we don't fit.

 > Quote - For "most of the CG hobbyist market", on what authority?

Just from looking through and about the galleries here, at R'otica, at DAZ, at... 

Given the lack of dynamic clothing in both markets and galleries, I'd certainly love to see your evidence for that statement.

 (edited because R'osity's edit box has really crappy font-handling)

Which gives you at best a fraction, less than 10% of all Poser users, so you're starting with a minority and trying to make even a smaller minority.

Lack of dynamic clothing, in slutwear yeah, but who needs dynamic for three cloth triangeles and three threads.  For lack of ds dynamic, blame daz for not producing the reasonably inexpensive method for the creators to create, which daz has not, and in all likelyhood will not.  You have in daz, one source, and one source only. 

The OP put up one picture, the intent, "Hey!  This ain't as bad as the v thing fanbois try to make it sound!"  The third post,nitpick the eyes, and within the first page, off on the inevitable treatices on why it's not "realistic".  It never fails, and it's pretty damned sickening.  Then come the inevitable treatces on why the "average poser user" won't learn to do some things, based on less than a ten percent sample of the total, and further based on the smaller percentage of that ten percent that actually post their work somewhere. 

I don't even look at any galleries, simply because 99.99% of what's there is not what I want to do, therefore, is not interesting, and not important.  The OP asked basically as simple question, "Is this attractive?"  Not to have the same hackneyed reasons that are endlessly posted as to why it's not.  The answer in my case is, yes, she's very attractive.  But some won't like it because it's a poser figure, and have no other reason.

Doric.

The "I" in Doric is Silent.