My query is about the people that do make the sexy images like I do, and there's a few very talented and respectable artists in this field. It's maybe a small community, but still a sizable one, enough to add a few zeros to anyone's profits. And still nothing gets sorted for us. I wanna know why?

If that's a serious question, then in my opinion it goes like this - 'sexy' images of a figure can be created with or without detailed genitals, they are not a requirement. They are though for creating pornographic images - as the definition of pornographic is "visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings".

Now, if a company creates a 3D figure with detailed genitalia then it could - with reason - be seen as facilitating the creation of pornography. That alone could have serious enough implications, but also remember that this is 3D, Poser scaling is fixed, and turned an adult figure into a childlike figure is quite simple …

So you can see where this is going. Issues like media witch hunts, commercial survivability and plain morality are more relevant to this kind of discussion than arrogance IMHO :)

----------------------------------------

Not approved by Scarfolk Council. For more information please reread. Or visit my local shop.