erogenesis opened this issue on Aug 14, 2013 ยท 71 posts
TrekkieGrrrl posted Wed, 14 August 2013 at 3:06 PM
Quote - When photographers do fashion shoots that aren't porn, they don't insist the model remove their genitals first, just in case they get in the way. They just put clothes on them.
This!
Personally, I do mostly male-based renders, and I'm not afraid to call some of it porn ;)
But to me, this whole discussion is bordering between hilarious and insane. IT IS NOT REAL PEOPLE!
So what if someone uses it to make pictures that are forbidden to act out IRL? It's not REAL. No real, live people are harmed!
Along the same lines, I'm an avid Dexter-fan. He kills people and chops them up. On tv. It does not make Michael C Hall a serial killer. IIt's make believe. Fiction. As is Poser porn.
I don't want anyone to limit what I can do with (or to) my Poser people. I don't want other people's moral imposed on me. I'm an adult, I can decide what my morals are :)
So I prefer "intact" figures. If I want to do porn one day and a Madonna-with-baby the next, I really SHOULD be able to use the same figure for both.
FREEBIES! | My Gallery | My Store | My FB | Tumblr |
You just can't put the words "Poserites" and "happy" in the same sentence - didn't you know that? LaurieA
Using Poser since 2002. Currently at Version 11.1 - Win 10.