Quote - > Quote - When photographers do fashion shoots that aren't porn, they don't insist the model remove their genitals first, just in case they get in the way. They just put clothes on them.

This!

Personally, I do mostly male-based renders, and I'm not afraid to call some of it porn ;)

But to me, this whole discussion is bordering between hilarious and insane. IT IS NOT REAL PEOPLE!

So what if someone uses it to make pictures that are forbidden to act out IRL? It's not REAL. No real, live people are harmed!

Along the same lines, I'm an avid Dexter-fan. He kills people and chops them up. On tv. It does not make Michael C Hall a serial killer. IIt's make believe. Fiction. As is Poser porn.

I don't want anyone to limit what I can do with (or to) my Poser people. I don't want other people's moral imposed on me. I'm an adult, I can decide what my morals are :)

So I prefer "intact" figures. If I want to do porn one day and a Madonna-with-baby the next, I really SHOULD be able to use the same figure for both.

Exactly!

I write erotica and am considering illustrating some of the texts with quality, and hopefully artistic renders. I don't think I should be embarrassed or ashamed to admit it. :)

---

PoserPro 2014, PS CS5.5 Ext, Nikon D300. Win 8, i7-4770 @ 3.4 GHz, AMD Radeon 8570, 12 GB RAM.