erogenesis opened this issue on Aug 14, 2013 · 71 posts
TrekkieGrrrl posted Wed, 14 August 2013 at 4:47 PM
Detachable genitals works fine for males, but for females there's really no reason not to have them there. Let's face it, they're only visible on a standing person if you look for them.
Just let the figure load with them in their smallest and most closed state. Then if some bigot chooses to enlarge and poke around.. well..
And yes, I chose the word bigot quite on purpose. I've yet to see (although I'm sure it will happen in some place of the world) people being born clothed. Or showering with burqas on.
Of course there are people qwho cover up the legs on chairs in order not to have such blatant nakedness in their dining room. But frankly, such people are IMO suited for an institution anyway. The kind with padded walls.
Now. The sake of child pornography... Well believe me, it has been done. Along with most sane people I don't condone it, but OTOH I can't get my knickers in a twist over someone doing it with VIRTUAL children (as long as I won't have to look at it). Who knows.. it MIGHT prevent them from living out their sick fantasies IRL?
If something is at all possible, there's someone who has already been there, done that. And believing that simply neutering a Poser lady will stop people from making something illegal is delusional.
FREEBIES! | My Gallery | My Store | My FB | Tumblr |
You just can't put the words "Poserites" and "happy" in the same sentence - didn't you know that? LaurieA
Using Poser since 2002. Currently at Version 11.1 - Win 10.