Quote - > Quote - Whether or not I wanted to render porn, nudes, or anything, I'd always prefer a model to have integrated genitals.  Just seems daft not to.

Yes!

If people are that worried about their reputation, and that certain that their target customers have zero interest in rendering nude or semi nude figures, why don't they model the figures with built in underwear that cannot be removed? I mean, it won't show if the figure is clothed.

The fact that the success of such a figure is hard to imagine should tell us that we know perfectly well whose money and what kind of renders drive the market.

Yea sorta like Action Man /G I Joe. I had some that came with an oddly malformed-but-fleshcoloured-groin. And some that came with built-in-swim trunks.

The nude ones were fitted with a match L The trunk guys were forever deemed to a life of looking without doing. (gawd and I was like 11-12 at the time.. ROFL)

(oh and yes I did fit my Barbie with an appropriate place to put said match, too >_<)

FREEBIES! | My Gallery | My Store | My FB | Tumblr |
You just can't put the words "Poserites" and "happy" in the same sentence - didn't you know that? LaurieA
  Using Poser since 2002. Currently at Version 11.1 - Win 10.